Hazrat Inayat Khan
[Answering Questions]
From Sangatha II, Nasihat, Advice, Answering Questions
After a lecture, if anyone asked a question, there are some considerations in giving the answer. There are answers which you cannot give or which you must not give. In that case it is better to say that this is a question which can be answered privately afterwards. Then there are personal questions a person may ask, and the speaker must be wise enough not to commit himself; if not, he is gone. For instance: "What do you believe?" "What is your opinion about it?" "What do you think about it?" The speaker is not there to say his personal opinion or what he personally believes, or perhaps his belief is so great and so high that it cannot be put in words.
Therefore always avoid it. Say, "That is a personal question." One says, "What would you do in this case?" Always say, "Well, I would not advise you to do the same as I would do in this case, because every person must do what he would do, not what another person would do in that case; because it is not only the case, it is the person also to be counted."
Then there are questions in which people want you to commit yourself, and if you commit yourself, then you are the loser; if you do not commit yourself, then you have gained. It is just like a game, when there is a question and answer between the audience. Either the speaker can be caught or he can keep above it. To keep above it is never to commit oneself. As soon as once a speaker commits himself, hundreds of questions will come to bring him down. So you see, he must feel at the same time, "I must not commit myself." But now you may ask what committing oneself means.
Committing oneself means saying something which gives you in the hand of the other in such a way that he can contradict you, and you have no support of your own word (from your own self) remaining there to hold your argument high. Very often you may be right and yet you may commit yourself. That is the dreadful part of it. It is not by saying something wrong that you commit yourself, but by saying something right; it is by standing responsible for what one has said. That is what one has to be very careful of. Or committing yourself means that from your own principle, you say what is right, but from the principle of others you could be defeated. (But if you had not said it you would not be defeated).
For instance, a speaker has told a story. He says that when the saint was sitting under the tree and the thief came and said, "I want a place to hide in; the police are after me." The saint said, "Climb on the tree and sit on the branch." The police came and asked, "Have you seen that thief?" He said, "No."
And now the speaker has said it. The speaker appreciated on the part of the saint, and felt that is all right. The audience asks, "Are you of the same opinion as the saint? Was the saint not against the State?" or, "Did the saint not encourage him to thieve?" and, "The saint told a lie." The saint could be accused of three things. If the speaker were headstrong he would say, "But it was a saint." Then the speaker has done wrong, because he thought what the saint did was right, but the others do not think so. He stands guilty before the others.
That is the delicate point: The higher you evolve, the less you are caught be principles of the ordinary mob. But at the same time if you commit yourself, you are attacked by all, condemned by all. Someone may say, "But how could the saint encourage the thief and tell a lie?" The eyes of the saint did not see the thief. The eyes have only seen God and nothing else. If it was a thief, then everybody is a thief for the saint, in one form or the other. Only in one form it is not seen as a thief, in another form it is. He is above it. Therefore he can see from his point of view. If others follow his point of view, they will be wrong. If they will encourage it, they will do wrong.
For a speaker it is a difficult thing. The speaker's position is difficult. He is before the public. They can condemn him, and they can never understand his point of view. So the speaker must know the game. It is a game. You may just take one word and slip out; put one word as a screen and get out. The person is looking at the screen and the speaker is out. It is just like a juggler who says, "Look, look here," and the object is gone there.
[Following Silence]
From Sangitha 2, Wasiat, Precept, Speaking
When you speak before people, whether known or unknown to you, let your speech follow your silence.
During that silence, meditate on the thought of harmony, feeling that you harmonize with every soul who is there, that no one is against you, that no one is antagonistic to you, that no one dislikes you, that no one disapproves of you.
By this feeling either you will remove for the time while you are speaking, if not for long, their antagonism, their ill feeling, their disapproval, or you will rise above it while you speak.
This silence will work as a healing for those whose mind is not in order.
And if you felt that a current of antagonism anyone in the audience is still striking, then answer it with the thought of harmony again; and so you will be able to harmonize with all those before you, your friends or foes. |